3.10
Collaborative Performance Measurement
Submitted by Jack Byrd, Jr.
Measuring performance is a part of our life. This activity illustrates how to use a collaborative process to create three different types of performance measurements. By practicing how to create performance measures, participants are able to reflect more deeply about what matters most to them.
Learning Goals
Distinguish between different types of performance measures.
Develop performance measures using a collaborative process.
Instructions
Set Up: Prepare for the Activity
Share the Collaborative Performance Measurement Worksheet as handouts or create copies of the file for each group to use.
Organize participants into small groups (4-6 ppl).
Begin by introducing the learning goals of this activity.
Step One: Introduce Three Levels of Performance Measurement (10 min)
Ask participants to reflect back on the algebra course they took in high school or college. Have them take the role of the teacher in that class trying to assess students' performance. Which of the measures listed below would be best for measuring performance:
The number of assignments students were asked to do.
The grade students received on a standardized test.
The students’ ability to use core concepts later in life.
Then explain the three levels of measurement:
Input - These measures represent the effort put into achieving a result.
Output - These measures represent the actual result that was achieved.
Outcome - These measures represent what happened after the output was achieved.
Ask participants to rank the importance of these measures. Which measure is the most desirable? Why? For example:
Input measures tend to be the easiest to identify but these are not indicative of performance itself but just effort expended. They are however commonly used.
Output measures are often reflective of surrogates of performance. They are often invented to give some sense of credibility. They are often commonly used.
Outcome measures can be challenging because it takes time to assess whether the initial results have a lasting impact. These measures are the most desirable, but hard to develop.
Step Two: Introduce Scenario (5 min)
In small groups, ask participants to review the scenario on the worksheet.
Scenario: Artificial Intelligence Ethics Training
An organization is trying to decide if they want to invest in an Artificial Intelligence Ethics Training for their employees. The training is expensive but could be valuable for their workforce. In order to decide whether to make this investment, the organization needs to decide how the effectiveness of the training will be measured.
Share the following prompts:
As a group, write a statement that describes what you think the training should achieve. What do you want trainees to be able to do or demonstrate after completing the training?
List the specific outcomes related to this overarching goal for the training on the worksheet.
Step Three: Develop Measures for Outcomes (10 min)
Next, ask each group to discuss and record on the worksheet:
How do you plan to measure the desired outcomes?
What measurement challenges do you anticipate?
What factors are likely to affect your measurements?
How might your measurements be misleading?
Step Four: Develop Measures for Inputs and Outputs (10 min)
Ask each group to make a list of potential inputs and outputs of the proposed training program.
How would you measure inputs and outputs of the training program?
What are the strengths and weaknesses of each measure?
How do these measures relate to our desired outcome?
Step Five: Arrive at Short-Term and Long-Term Measures (10 min)
Ask participants to think about the input and output measures and how they can be made as useful as possible in the short term. Challenge them to think of how these measures can be used in linked combinations (e.g., number of participants who attended the training and then passed a qualifying test).
Next, ask participants to think about what can be done now to capture the information for eventual use in outcome measures.
Step Six: Debrief as a Full Group (10 min)
Why is it important to develop performance measures collaboratively?
When we evaluate outcomes, what matters most? Numbers? Stories? What seems more credible? Why?
If you were to use your understanding of input, output, and outcome measures, how would you answer the question: How are you better because of the CDP certificate program?
TIME
55
min
MODULE
Critical Collaboration
This activity is more involved or complicated than a beginner activity. This activity is for groups that have established trust or experience with discussion.
This activity can be easily modified for asynchronous learning. See Sample Asynchronous Certificate Program Design to illustrate sample sequencing.
This activity is suitable for professional or more formal learning environments.
Tell us what you think. Rate and review this activity:
Have any helpful suggestions or modifications for this activity?
Share them in the comments below!
0 Comments
YD
December 3, 2022 at 1:58:08 AM
Activity 4.8 provides useful phrases and techniques, as well as helps participants develop their own, to join in during discussions and express their views according to the goals they choose for themselves on what they want to offer to the discussion and how they want to be perceived.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 1:52:48 AM
Activity 4.7 uses a tactile and fun method, like a bag of beans, to have participants experience what it is like to have different amounts of power in a conversation. This activity also highlights how we base our ideas of how power is distributed on stereotypes.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 1:48:29 AM
Activity 4.6 employs useful tools like the Question Chart to help participants learn how to craft "good questions" that move beyond any assumptions they have about the views of others based on stereotypes or third party descriptions, and unearth their true views on the issue.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 1:45:08 AM
Activity 4.5 uses visual aids like the Emotion Wheel to push participants to move beyond just cognitive empathy and shows how to reflect back the emotions and understand their source through dialogue. It also helps participants differentiate between messages of intentional empathy and problem-solving.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 1:39:46 AM
Activity 4.4 uses both individual written reflection and discussion in small and large groups to explore the which aspects of a person's identity we use to determine if they should be included in the conversation on a particular issue. This activity also give participants to practice explaining and negotiating who is chosen.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 1:33:37 AM
Activity 4.3 uses physical movement and both lighthearted and serious topics to help participants see how positions on different topics lie on a continuum and how positions can change as one is exposed to new information or perspectives. Participants also flex their imaginative and creative muscle by arguing for the position opposite to theirs.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 1:28:28 AM
Activity 4.2 breaks down the individual aspects of active listening into separate rounds/steps to help participants consciously and methodically learn and practice this skill.
YD
December 3, 2022 at 1:25:28 AM
Activity 4.1digs deep into the many facets of social identity, by using drawing, as well as both written silent reflection and verbal discussion in small and large groups.
YD
November 29, 2022 at 6:26:51 AM
Activity 3.8 easily helps visualize the many dimensions of a topic by using the fishbone diagram.
YD
November 29, 2022 at 6:24:44 AM
Activity 3.7 provides useful mind tricks to help practice patience and giving people the benefit of the doubt, thus creating the sense of psychological safety required in collaborative efforts.